Bicyclist hit by a car gets $3,752 bill for the car’s damage

Communicate about a one particular-two punch. Previous July, Vancouver, B.C., resident Ben Bolliger was struck though using his bicycle by a driver who, he suggests, ran a halt indicator. Considering that then, he is been through surgery, a CT scan, 7 followups with X-rays, 26 physical therapy sessions, 10 rehab classes, and two splints.

Last week, he received a letter from the community insurance policies firm ICBC. It stated, in accordance to the Vancouver Sunshine, that Bolliger was accountable for injury to the car. The monthly bill totaled $3,752.01 CAD for mend to the windshield and hood.

“Our purchaser has reported this crash, and as mentioned in our previous correspondence, you are dependable for any resulting damage or personal injury sustained by our insured,” the letter examine. “You were driving an uninsured vehicle at the time of the reduction. This means you do not have insurance policies coverage for this decline and need to repay the expense of our insured’s assert.”

Bolliger claims the accident broke his bike in two and threw him on to a rocky surface 45 feet away. “My appropriate arm was totally damaged, and I’ll hardly ever have entire range of movement in that arm again,” he explained to the Solar. “My foot was broken, they pulled about 10 pieces of his windshield out of my back, and that took near to 100 stitches and staples.”

Bolliger provides that he has missed 4 months of get the job done, and while he made a declare versus ICBC as well, the coverage firm designed him use up all his sick time and vacation times, utilize for work insurance policy, and even then only included 80 p.c of his wages.

“It’s a punch in the intestine. It definitely is a punch in the gut,” Bolliger said. “How am I on the hook for having hit by a car or truck?”

The source of the difficulty is a new, confusingly named “no-fault” car insurance policy regulation that passed in Canada in 2020. describes the particulars, but in practice it permits drivers to pay out for a decreased level whilst pedestrians and cyclists shed electric power in situations like this. In a dystopian twist, ICBC phone calls their no-fault protection “improved care.”

Vancouver attorney Kyla Lee claimed circumstances like Bolliger’s are turning out to be more widespread, due to the fact cyclists and other uninsured individuals you should not have recourse to sue ICBC. The new product, she states, “provides ICBC all the electrical power.”

However one more lawyer who spoke with the Sunshine thinks ICBC’s needs will be dropped, and the province’s solicitor basic has instructed ICBC to look into the circumstance, it is nonetheless producing Bolliger pointless complications when the insurer should really be creating his existence less difficult.